Big crisis is currently rocking the Nigerian Ports Authority (NPA) over issues bothering on misinformation between management and the agency’s board chairman hitherto the recent corporate head office vandal by suspected hoodlums.
The disagreement has created palpable tension and apprehension among staff of the agency, as both the Managing Director of the Ports Authority, Ms. Hadiza Bala-Usman and the Board Chairman, Chief George Rickets are not on the same page based on the damage of facility by hoodlums who hijacked the recent EndSARS protest in the country.
The MD and the Board Chairman also disagreed on how the destruction of some part of the NPA headquarters and that of Tin Can Island Port would effect the operations of the Ports Authority and the port economy in general.
Apparently reacting to an earlier statement credited to Chief George Rickets that the attack on the NPA House and its facilities in Tin Can Island Port, could disrupt the ports operations and that of the entire port economy; Hadiza on Sunday, in her first ever public comment more than one week after the incident took place, said; “The situation has not affected operations of the authority in any way as we have continued to render our services unhindered.”
Industry watchers also queried the MD for the comments , seeking response on the need to known why staff should work from home when everything is intact.
Our correspondent reports that though the MD’s belated assurances has doused the fears of possible disruptions of port activities, it has also to a reasonable extent challenged the audacity of the Board chairman to speak on the matter before the managing director, even though she may have gone missing for over a week since the dastardly attack took place.
Analysts say the Hadiza’s clarifications have also raised other fundamental issues, such as who carried out the attack, as she had reportedly linked the attack to both unknown persons and hoodlums.
A statement that has lent credence to allegations that the arson may have been an insider’s orchestration, presumably undertaken to conveniently pass the blame on the hoodlums that went on a destruction and looting spree during the EndSARS protests by Nigerian youths.
The Ports Authority had also in a statement by its General Manager Corporate and Strategic Communications, Engr. Adams Jato, blamed the attacks on the NPA’s Tin Can Island facilities and the NPA House on unknown persons and hoodlums.
However, the MD’s position has confused observers as the Lagos State Police Command had last week announced that a large number of hoodlums who perpetrated the acts of arson and looting during the protests, have been arrested and charged to court.
Stakeholders further expressed worries that the opposing views and assessment of the damage done to the authority’s facilities by the managing director and Board chairman could be a pointer to a cover up, a concern that is accentuated by the NPA helmsman’s display of lack of urgency in making a public statement on the incident.
The statement reads in part: “The management of the Nigerian Ports Authority regrets the attack on its 26/28 Marina Road, Lagos, corporate headquarters and the Tin Can Island Port by unknown persons on Wednesday October 21st and Tuesday October 20th, 2020 respectively.
“The attack on the Tin Can Island Port commenced at 9:45am on Tuesday October 20th 2020. The hoodlums made an attempt to forcefully gain access into the port, attacked the administrative building and set ablaze a truck which was evacuating cargo.
“The attackers at the headquarters numbering over 300 persons, gained access into the premises at 8:42am on Wednesday October 21st 2020 from the outer Broad Street wing brandishing daggers, sticks and cutlasses.”
The authority said the attackers disarmed and chased away security personnel on duty out of the headquarters premises, and thereafter, “proceeded to burn and vandalize several vehicles belonging to the authority and some members of staff”, after which a wing of the office building was reportedly set on fire.
“After an assessment of the extent of damage, it was discovered that apart from the annex wing that was burnt, many offices were vandalized, while computers, printers, water dispensers and other electronic devices were looted.
“A total of Twenty-seven (27) vehicles, including cars, utility vehicles, pick up vans and staff buses were set on fire, while Thirty-three (33) other vehicles, twenty-two of which belong to members of staff were vandalized. A Toyota Prado SUV, a Bajaj Motorcycle and one Hilux patrol van were also stolen from the premises.”
It will be recalled that Nigeria Maritime 360, an industry news medium, reported that Rickets had in a statement said the EndSARS protest attacks on the authority’s facilities will affect its operations as well as affect ports economic activities.
Chief Rickets was quoted as saying that “while the youths have the rights to protest, it has become obvious that the peaceful protest was hijacked by criminal elements. The destruction of a critical facility such as the NPA building will affect the nation’s economy.
“The NPA belongs to all Nigerians and as an import dependent nation, it is the port that feeds the whole nation. If they start pulling down critical structures of this nature, where do they expect the government to get the funds to meet their demands? he asked.
It is however noteworthy that the Port Authority said that all its assets are comprehensively insured, and informed that “insurers are currently undergoing an assessment of the damages.”
Observers further cautioned the MD and Board Chairman to resolve the issue amicably through dissemination of accurate and concise information to the general public.
According to the National Coordinator, Save Nigerian Freight Forwarders Importers Exporters Coalition , Chief Osita Chukwu Patrick ” There is a lacuna somewhere that must be corrected by the board and the MD.
Patrick said ” The earlier both parties resolve the issues at hand the better for the maritime industry “.